Available for previous users of Dragon for Mac, v5 and Dragon Dictate, v4. Office for mac digital download. Dragon Dictate for Mac : Free Download - Premium voice-recognition solution.
Dragon V6 Review For Mac 2021 ReviewsNTI SSD & HDD Cloning Kit. Licence to 1 user, and the user can install the Dragon software up to 4 Windows Computer Compatible with Windows 8/10 Compatible with Office 2010/2013/2015/2016 and Office 365 Official Australia Distributor for 20 years.Win Business Software. Best Speech Recognition Software For Mac 2021 Reviews.Dragon Professional 15 Software Instant Digital Delivery within 20 seconds of ordering online. Smart displays, iOS 12.5.5 and Catalina security update, iPhone 13 problem with Apple Watch unlockingDragon Professional Individual for Mac, V6, makes it easy to get started with speech recognition. #1581: New Safari 15 features, Center Stage vs. Step by step guide for Nuance's Dragon Dictate for Mac, with pictures.#1578: Apple delays CSAM detection, upgrade Quicken 2007 to Quicken Deluxe, App Store settlement and regulatory changes Apple lawsuit decided, Internet privacy limitations, combine Mac speakers #1579: Apple “California Streaming” event, OS security updates, Epic Games v. There are times when Dragon will still crash my Mac if I try to dictate in word. I use a Mac, but my friends and colleagues who use PCs have been getting much better accuracy for a long time (many years) with Dragon. With a next-generation speech engine leveraging Deep Learning technology, dictate and transcribe faster and more accurately than ever before, and spend less time on documentation and more time on activities that boost the bottom line.Now to the issue of the Mac versus PC the effectiveness of Dragon. Support for user-added custom words: Every profession has its own terminology and jargon, which is part of why there are legal, medical, and law enforcement versions of Dragon for Windows. He has suggested several ways that Apple needs to improve macOS speech recognition to make it a viable alternative to Dragon Professional Individual: Some level of voice control of the Mac is also available via Dictation Commands, but again, it’s not as powerful as what was available from Dragon Professional Individual.TidBITS reader Todd Scheresky is a software engineer who relies on Dragon Professional Individual for his work because he’s a quadriplegic and has no use of his arms. The continuous speech-to-text software was widely considered to be the gold standard for speech recognition, and Nuance continues to develop and sell the Windows versions of Dragon Home, Dragon Professional Individual, and various profession-specific solutions.This move is a blow to professional users—such as doctors, lawyers, and law enforcement—who depended on Dragon for dictating to their Macs, but the community most significantly affected are those who can control their Macs only with their voices.What about Apple’s built-in accessibility solutions? macOS does support voice dictation, although my experience is that it’s not even as good as dictation in iOS, much less Dragon Professional Individual. Support for cursor positioning and mouse button events: Although Scheresky acknowledges that macOS’s Dictation Commands are pretty good and provide decent support for text cursor positioning, macOS has nothing like Nuance’s MouseGrid, which divides the screen into a 3-by-3 grid and enables the user to zoom in to a grid coordinate, then displaying another 3-by-3 grid to continue zooming. Also, Apple’s speech recognition isn’t continuous—it works for only a few minutes before stopping and needing to be reinvoked. But Scheresky believes it needs to become speaker-dependent, so it can learn from your corrections to improve recognition accuracy. Support for speaker-dependent continuous speech recognition: Currently, macOS’s speech recognition is speaker-independent, which means that it works pretty well for everyone. Parallels desktop 12 for mac freeIt’s also not clear how well they interface with current versions of macOS.Regardless, if Apple enhanced macOS’s voice recognition in the ways Scheresky suggests, it would become significantly more useful and would give users with physical limitations significantly more control over their Macs… and their lives. An expensive head-mounted pointing device, although the SmartNav is $600 and the HeadMouse Nano and TrackerPro are both about $1000. An off-the-shelf hack using Keyboard Maestro and Automator. Dedicated software, in the form of a $35 app called iTracker. There are some better alternatives for mouse pointer positioning: He talks about this in a video.Unfortunately, although Switch Control would let Scheresky control a Mac using a sip-and-puff switch or a head switch, such solutions would be both far slower than voice and a literal pain in the neck. Now that day has finally arrived.That said, it is absolutely outrageous that Nuance effectively doubled the price of the the last update in order to milk their existing customers for as much as the market might bear, without providing meaningful improvements, before abandoning the product. From the day that MacSpeech sold transferred its product to Nuance I was concerned that this would eventually happen given their jaded history. Frankly I am not that unhappy to see them disappear, hopefully opening the door to a more user centric publisher of speech recognition for the Mac should Apple not enhance its current product to fill the gap. Such improvements will help both those who face physical challenges to using the Mac and those for whom dictation is a professional necessity.Throughout its history Nuance has been an unreliable, buggy, product with abismal technical support. Please enhance macOS speech recognition to support user-added custom words, speaker-dependent continuous speech recognition that learns from user corrections to improve accuracy, and cursor positioning and mouse button events.Thanks for encouraging Apple to bring macOS’s accessibility features up to the level necessary to provide an alternative to Dragon Professional Individual for Mac. MacOS is more widely used than it used to be and many more persons with disabilities have come to depend on it.As someone with a visual disability, I lost patience with Apple when they abandoned colored and custom icons in the Finder window sidebar in Lion. Then Nuance purchased Mac Speech and their Mac product was reborn.But I agree, it is incumbent on Apple to fill the void now. Nuance abandoned the Mac version once before, and a company named Mac Speech filled the void for a few years. I’m not familiar with the name you use, Dragon Professional Individual. I was one of those suckers that did the update hoping for the best.So the question now arises, do existing users who opted for the last, very expensive update, that still never properly worked reliably and often crashed, have recourse against Nuance, given the product never consistenty functioned in a reliable fashion? I have no legal experience but could be grounds for a possible class action lawsuit?I would invite other readers to share their thoughts on these questions.As I’ve known it, Nuance’s product is called Dragon Dictate. ![]() Who knows when, if ever, they will wake up. As with many big, successful companies, their leadership is far removed from their user base, and hubris has set in. And he has use of his hands when he needs them, so some of the Mac’s limitations don’t bother him.Sad to say, Apple no longer caters to users, as they once did. He just wanted to be able to dictate e-mails and such. Interestingly, in Safari, pictures and icons retain their true colors when the screen is reversed, which isn’t a bad thing.Meanwhile, a while back I pointed a client to the Mac’s dictation feature when he got tired of wrestling with Dragon Dictate, and paying for their upgrades. In my case, I reverse my screen, as now, so that I see white text on a black background, which is, for me, easier to read. For some reason this has not affected Apple’s bottom line, but it’s only a matter of time before the company’s reputation for high standards suffers and sales follow suit. His tolerance for mediocrity in quality control is monumental.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorKatie ArchivesCategories |